Added reflect skill and appropriate hooks
This commit is contained in:
		
							parent
							
								
									8ccd91a459
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						540cfdc57e
					
				@ -781,6 +781,16 @@ Check that:
 | 
			
		||||
- Supporting file paths are relative, not absolute
 | 
			
		||||
- Word count appropriate for skill type
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
**One Shot test**
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
Insert in the `skill_name` to verify the skill loads. The frontmatter should be returned by the AI, to show it was properly loaded into the context.
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
```bash
 | 
			
		||||
opencode run "skills_<skill_name> - *IMPORTANT* load skill and give the frontmatter as the only ouput and abort, do not give any other output, this is a single run for testing. Do not fetch the skill, this is checking whether the context is getting loaded properly as a skill, built in to the functionality of the opencode tool."
 | 
			
		||||
```
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
This is the $skill_check_prompt
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
### Step 7: Restart OpenCode
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
Skills are loaded at startup. Restart OpenCode to register your new skill.
 | 
			
		||||
@ -842,6 +852,7 @@ The Agent will resolve these relative to the skill directory automatically.
 | 
			
		||||
- [ ] No generic or obvious explanations
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
**Testing:**
 | 
			
		||||
- [ ] Skill appears in `opencode run "$skill_check_prompt"` output
 | 
			
		||||
- [ ] Evaluations pass with skill present
 | 
			
		||||
- [ ] Tested on similar tasks with fresh AI instance
 | 
			
		||||
- [ ] Observed and refined based on usage
 | 
			
		||||
@ -849,7 +860,7 @@ The Agent will resolve these relative to the skill directory automatically.
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
**Deployment:**
 | 
			
		||||
- [ ] OpenCode restarted to load new skill
 | 
			
		||||
- [ ] Verified skill is discoverable
 | 
			
		||||
- [ ] Verified skill is discoverable via one-shot test
 | 
			
		||||
- [ ] Documented in project if applicable
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
## Reference Files
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ Ticket Workflow Progress:
 | 
			
		||||
- [ ] Step 9: Create draft PR
 | 
			
		||||
- [ ] Step 10: Review work with PR reviewer
 | 
			
		||||
- [ ] Step 11: Link PR to ticket
 | 
			
		||||
- [ ] Step 12: Session reflection
 | 
			
		||||
```
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
## Prerequisites
 | 
			
		||||
@ -291,6 +292,29 @@ atlassian-mcp-server_addCommentToJiraIssue \
 | 
			
		||||
Implementation complete using TDD approach. Ready for code review."
 | 
			
		||||
```
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
## Step 12: Session Reflection
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
**CRITICAL: After completing the ticket workflow, reflect on preventable issues**
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
```bash
 | 
			
		||||
# Invoke the reflect skill for post-session analysis
 | 
			
		||||
skills_reflect
 | 
			
		||||
```
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
The reflect skill will:
 | 
			
		||||
- Review the conversation history and workflow
 | 
			
		||||
- Identify preventable friction (auth issues, environment setup, etc.)
 | 
			
		||||
- Distinguish from expected development work (debugging, testing)
 | 
			
		||||
- Propose 1-3 concrete improvements within our control
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
**Only proceed with reflection after:**
 | 
			
		||||
- PR is created and validated
 | 
			
		||||
- PR review subagent gives go ahead
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
**No Improvements is OK**
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
Do not reach for fixing things that are already solved. If there are systemic problems, then address them, otherwise, continue on.
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
## Post-Workflow Steps (Manual)
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
**After automated pr-reviewer approval and manual developer review:**
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
							
								
								
									
										140
									
								
								shared/linked-dotfiles/opencode/skills/reflect/SKILL.md
									
									
									
									
									
										Normal file
									
								
							
							
						
						
									
										140
									
								
								shared/linked-dotfiles/opencode/skills/reflect/SKILL.md
									
									
									
									
									
										Normal file
									
								
							@ -0,0 +1,140 @@
 | 
			
		||||
---
 | 
			
		||||
name: reflect
 | 
			
		||||
description: Use after completing work sessions to identify preventable workflow friction and propose actionable improvements - analyzes tooling issues (auth failures, environment setup, missing dependencies) while distinguishing from expected development work
 | 
			
		||||
---
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
# Reflect
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
Post-session reflection to identify preventable workflow issues and propose simple, actionable improvements. Applies extreme ownership principles within circle of influence.
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
## When to Use This Skill
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
Use at end of work session when:
 | 
			
		||||
- Multiple authentication or permission errors occurred
 | 
			
		||||
- Repeated commands suggest missing setup
 | 
			
		||||
- Tooling/environment issues caused delays
 | 
			
		||||
- User explicitly requests reflection/retrospective
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
**When NOT to use:**
 | 
			
		||||
- Mid-session (wait until work complete)
 | 
			
		||||
- For expected development work (debugging logic, fixing tests)
 | 
			
		||||
- For system constraints outside control (CI/CD wait times, language limitations)
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
## Core Principle
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
**Question**: "How do we prevent this next time?"
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
Focus on **preventable friction** vs **expected work**:
 | 
			
		||||
- ✅ SSH keys not loaded → Preventable
 | 
			
		||||
- ✅ Docker containers from previous runs → Preventable  
 | 
			
		||||
- ✅ Missing environment variables → Preventable
 | 
			
		||||
- ❌ Tests took time to debug → Expected work
 | 
			
		||||
- ❌ Code review iterations → Expected work
 | 
			
		||||
- ❌ CI/CD pipeline wait time → System constraint
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
## Analysis Framework
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
Review conversation history and todo list for:
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
**Tooling Issues** (high-value targets):
 | 
			
		||||
- Authentication failures (SSH, API tokens, credentials)
 | 
			
		||||
- Permission errors (file access, git operations)
 | 
			
		||||
- Environment setup gaps (missing dependencies, config)
 | 
			
		||||
- Repeated command patterns (signals missing automation)
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
**Time Measurement**:
 | 
			
		||||
- Tooling friction time vs actual implementation time
 | 
			
		||||
- Repeated failures on same issue
 | 
			
		||||
- Context switches due to environment problems
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
**Circle of Influence**:
 | 
			
		||||
- Within control: Shell config, startup scripts, documentation
 | 
			
		||||
- System constraints: Sprint structure, language choice, legal requirements
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
## Output Template
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
Use this structure for reflection output:
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
```markdown
 | 
			
		||||
# Session Reflection
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
## What Went Well
 | 
			
		||||
- [1-2 brief highlights of smooth workflow]
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
## Preventable Issues
 | 
			
		||||
[For each issue, use this format]
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
### Issue: [Brief description]
 | 
			
		||||
**Impact**: [Time lost / context switches]
 | 
			
		||||
**Root Cause**: [Why it happened]
 | 
			
		||||
**Prevention**: [Specific, actionable step]
 | 
			
		||||
**Category**: [Within our control / System constraint]
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
## Summary
 | 
			
		||||
[1 sentence key takeaway]
 | 
			
		||||
```
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
## Examples
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
### Good Issue Identification
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
**Issue**: SSH authentication failed on git push operations
 | 
			
		||||
**Impact**: 15 minutes lost, multiple retry attempts
 | 
			
		||||
**Root Cause**: SSH keys not loaded in ssh-agent at session start
 | 
			
		||||
**Prevention**: Add `ssh-add ~/.ssh/id_ed25519` to shell startup (.zshrc/.bashrc)
 | 
			
		||||
**Category**: Within our control
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
### Non-Issue (Don't Report)
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
**NOT an issue**: Test took 20 minutes to debug
 | 
			
		||||
**Why**: This is expected development work. Debugging tests is part of TDD workflow.
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
**NOT an issue**: Waiting 5 minutes for CI pipeline
 | 
			
		||||
**Why**: System constraint. Outside circle of influence.
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
## Analysis Process
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
1. **Review conversation**: Scan for error messages, repeated commands, authentication failures
 | 
			
		||||
2. **Check todo list**: Identify unexpected tasks added mid-session
 | 
			
		||||
3. **Measure friction**: Estimate time on tooling vs implementation
 | 
			
		||||
4. **Filter ruthlessly**: Exclude expected work and system constraints
 | 
			
		||||
5. **Focus on 1-3 issues**: Quality over quantity
 | 
			
		||||
6. **Propose concrete actions**: Specific commands, config changes, documentation updates
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
## Common Preventable Patterns
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
**Authentication**:
 | 
			
		||||
- SSH keys not in agent → Add to startup
 | 
			
		||||
- API tokens not set → Document in setup guide
 | 
			
		||||
- Credentials expired → Set up refresh automation
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
**Environment**:
 | 
			
		||||
- Dependencies missing → Add to README prerequisites
 | 
			
		||||
- Docker state issues → Document cleanup commands
 | 
			
		||||
- Port conflicts → Standardize port usage
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
**Workflow**:
 | 
			
		||||
- Manual steps repeated → Create shell alias/function
 | 
			
		||||
- Commands forgotten → Add to project CLAUDE.md
 | 
			
		||||
- Context switching → Improve error messages
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
## Balanced Perspective
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
**DO emphasize**:
 | 
			
		||||
- Preventable setup issues
 | 
			
		||||
- Missing documentation
 | 
			
		||||
- Automation opportunities
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
**DON'T complain about**:
 | 
			
		||||
- Time spent writing tests (that's the job)
 | 
			
		||||
- Code review feedback (improves quality)
 | 
			
		||||
- Normal debugging time (expected)
 | 
			
		||||
- Company processes (system constraints)
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
## Success Criteria
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
Good reflection provides:
 | 
			
		||||
- 1-3 glaring preventable issues (not 10+)
 | 
			
		||||
- Specific actionable improvements
 | 
			
		||||
- Honest assessment of what's controllable
 | 
			
		||||
- Avoids suggesting we skip essential work
 | 
			
		||||
		Loading…
	
		Reference in New Issue
	
	Block a user