I guess I like AI now??
This commit is contained in:
parent
c10b765903
commit
81e5bff5d8
79
content/posts/ai-hestiation-turning-around.md
Normal file
79
content/posts/ai-hestiation-turning-around.md
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
date: 2025-01-28
|
||||
description: "I realized that I've been holding myself back because of pride."
|
||||
# image: ""
|
||||
lastmod: 2025-01-28
|
||||
showTableOfContents: true
|
||||
tags: ["AI", "Reflection"]
|
||||
title: "AI Hesitation Turning Around"
|
||||
type: "post"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# I'm a Bit of a Rebel
|
||||
|
||||
I feel like some of what I do in life isn't because it's the "best". I certainly love optimizing workflows, switching
|
||||
keyboard layouts because QWERTY is clearly not the best, learning and customizing window managers instead of using broad
|
||||
defaults from full desktop environments. But, I also do lots of things that are decidedly not in pursuit of efficiency
|
||||
or optimization:
|
||||
|
||||
- Firefox is not faster than Chrome, and AFAICT it still isn't really much better than Chromium
|
||||
privacy-wise
|
||||
- Linux causes me pain, MacOS supposedly "Just Works™"
|
||||
- NixOS causes me more pain, but I also love it
|
||||
- I daily drove a OnePlus 6 with [PostMarketOS](https://postmarketos.org/) for a few months last year. So cool to carry
|
||||
a terminal with you. But [Termux](https://f-droid.org/en/packages/com.termux/) exists, and my wife could not reach
|
||||
me reliably.
|
||||
|
||||
I don't value ease of use as much as other values like privacy, openness, and tinker-ability. As most
|
||||
things in life, it's always a trade-off. I get teased by many of my coworkers and friends for being the "linux guy" or
|
||||
similar, for choosing to swim upstream despite the more "obvious" easy choice of using the proprietary, super affordable
|
||||
electric boat (with better battery life BTW). So how could I come around to these over-hyped, shark-backed, environment
|
||||
burning GPU crunchers??
|
||||
|
||||
# Just One More AI Bro
|
||||
|
||||
I have seen it as a crutch. I see it as having very muddy licensing
|
||||
and potential legal issues in its future. I see it partly destroying the craft of software engineering. I think its
|
||||
very over hyped.
|
||||
|
||||
_BUT_
|
||||
|
||||
I think its time I give up fighting against the machine in this respect and see if using AI
|
||||
as a tool in my toolbelt helps me become a better engineer.
|
||||
|
||||
## The Pivot Point
|
||||
|
||||
I read [this blog post](https://blog.nelhage.com/post/personal-software-with-claude/) about building personal software
|
||||
with Claude and I realized that perhaps I could better my life and those around me by taking advantage of this tool. Was
|
||||
it just stubbornness and pride that was preventing me from benefitting? You may think its just FOMO, but I've held off
|
||||
for a long time from using AI.[^1] I think it is just a recognition of my hard-headed and misplaced judgement. So, today
|
||||
I am signing up for a Claude account. I'm going to build with AI (I'm not going to write these posts with it though). As
|
||||
this new perspective settled in my mind, I had a couple thoughts:
|
||||
|
||||
## Using Non-Deterministic Tools
|
||||
|
||||
One of the hardest challenges I think adopting AI use is due to its imprecise and ever-changing nature. Imagine using
|
||||
a compiler that failed to compile some C code, then when you just UP arrow and rerun `cmake` it works. No change in its
|
||||
input. In the world of software where precision, intent, and design matter, this feels like an Uno Reverse. This is a
|
||||
tough tool to learn, depend, and rely on. A carpenter's ruler that moves its inch notches depending on the time of day??
|
||||
But, it's not just a ruler. It is so good at predicting tokens that it has some semblance of intelligence. So much so
|
||||
that many people, even those that know intimately the internals of the technology, believe it is doing more than it is.
|
||||
|
||||
## Is this like C?
|
||||
|
||||
When the assemblers of the world got tired of porting their code to each new architecture and came up with C, was there
|
||||
a similar ripple in the software slinging community? Writing at such a high level will result in too many "head in the
|
||||
clouds" engineers. And perhaps, these new high-level developers will never even learn assembly! They will lose touch
|
||||
with the very systems that execute their code!! Unimaginable at the time, but certainly a reality we live in now. I have
|
||||
a few relatives entering the field and learning to code, and I don't imagine they will ever write assembly. I myself
|
||||
have written very little, and hardly think in assembly day-to-day.
|
||||
|
||||
## Onwards into a Higher Future
|
||||
|
||||
Not sure if it's a higher plane of Nirvana I am about to enter or if I'll be getting too close to the sun melting my
|
||||
waxed wings and plummet to my death, but I figure its never a bad idea to keep my mind open and give it a year.
|
||||
|
||||
[^1]: Not entirely. My best guess is I've queried ChatGPT less than 50 times. I have used it over the last two years as a Google
|
||||
Search replacement occassionally. When AI was first released I tried it with some coding / reasoning tasks and formed
|
||||
most of my opinion from that experience.
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user