add two posts

.aspell.en.pws

@@ -114,6 +114,7 @@ syscalls
 TCL
 Termux
 tik
+tiktok
 tils
 TILs
 tok

.image-manifest

@@ -25,3 +25,5 @@ c59b6bfe6695c3d82b13375098d4c4f8ac62859e53e7a028d2dee3680f18d6c9  static/images/
 29604251ddc2c916e470d77d37a88539888adb3dba45b8ce7c238fdd1aa88e95  static/images/rpi-bookshelf.webp
 160b041274ea70f90484af2bc376f969888d2418dabc51eef55ce05ea306c9b9  static/images/salt-lake-basin-view.webp
 d2db5eb5fb460359a9017eba824d9e07d80adf206b30953c0d5fbcea4e421e89  static/images/red-path.webp
+9e9ccdd43cf44fa8f830dd34043a8ddb6b596565c8b56ccc59d596184b1f18b9  static/images/moonlit_landscape_with_bridge_1990.6.1.webp
+eebed31e76a47681a3aae7809034ecd7366f3680068224488a58f24e8974ae85  static/images/woman_holding_a_balance_1942.9.97.webp

content/posts/26-03-13-art-analysis-woman-holding-a-balance.md

@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
+---
+date: 2026-03-13T23:57:57-06:00
+description: "My first attempt to do some art analysis myself on a painting I've never seen before."
+image: "/images/woman_holding_a_balance_1942.9.97.webp"
+image_caption: "Johannes Vermeer, courtesy of National Gallery of Art"
+image_alt: "In this vertical painting, a woman stands near the corner of a dimly lit room, facing our left in profile and looking down at a balance she holds suspended in her right hand over a wooden table. She wears a peacock-blue velvet jacket with a white hood and fur lining, and a voluminous, mustard-yellow skirt. A window near the upper left corner is partially covered by a canary-yellow curtain. Light coming in through that window falls on the pale skin of the woman's face and hands, and highlights the white trim of her garment. Her left hand, closer to us, rests on the edge of the table near two open boxes, and a blue cloth is bunched at the back of the table to our left. Gold chains and pearl strands drape over the edge of one box. The woman stands in front of a framed painting. Much of the detail is lost in shadow but at the top center of the painting, a person surrounded by a golden halo floats in the sky with both arms raised, and is flanked by people encased within a bank of clouds. Nude people on the ground below in the painting, seen to either side of the woman, writhe, twist, and point upward."
+lastmod: 2026-03-20T03:02:02-06:00
+showTableOfContents: false
+tags: ["art", "religion", "ai"]
+title: "Art Analysis: Woman Holding a Balance - Vermeer"
+type: "post"
+draft: false
+---
+
+I don't think I've ever really sat with art. Static art.
+
+Motion pictures and temporal audio (music) feel like a different class. The still art requires something more from you.
+
+I wanted to know what that more was, and what better time than the present.
+
+## My Journey to The Balance
+
+Not knowing any good resources I asked AI (Claude) the following:
+
+{{<aside>}}
+I feel like I'm not sure how to appreciate art. I have done some writing and doodling, not terrible at either, but when I read poetry, or look at art (paintings, photography) I feel like I'm not sure how to appreciate it. Is there a science to it? or just some helpful mindsets to take toward observing art? I feel like I've moved past the "need" for art to speak to me and instead just be open to whatever a piece of art may invoke. What sorts of things make art art? I imagine its in the eye of the beholder? Is art's worth determined by its creator? Can you appreciate art if the artist is a terrible person? Not exactly sure how to feel toward art, but I haven't ever really had any sort of moving experience with art outside of music and motion picture.
+{{</aside>}}
+
+Aside from the philosophical questions (perhaps they all were), some interesting highlights I pulled out:
+
+- Visual art and poetry require you to impose a temporal unfolding yourself (unlike video or music that "play")
+- _First Pass_ With no context, look at a piece of art for a few minutes. Notice what your eye is drawn to. Notice how you feel.
+- _Context_ Then with some observation, learn more about the art. Its background, the artist's process.
+- _Synthesis_ Sit with this new information and the art again. See what arises in you.
+
+With this rough framework here is what I felt and observed about Vermeer's 400 year-old painting:
+
+{{<aside caption="Analysis">}}
+
+### On First Pass
+
+- The balance sits perfectly balanced in the very center of the painting.
+- There are many other features of the painting that are balanced, a dark blue shade of fabrics on the middle left and right sides, light yellow of the window and dress in the top-left and bottom right.
+- At the same time, lack of balance in the painting: only one woman on a side. The much larger framed painting in the background on the right compared to the one on the wall on the left, the lighter portion of the painting is the top right, darker bottom left (cut diagonally almost, which feels balanced more than imbalanced I suppose)
+- The woman's gaze is easy to follow - lands on the balance she is holding
+- The woman seems perhaps pregnant?
+- The framed painting seems like a Jesus second coming or judgement day type? perhaps the woman being a Mary symbol?
+- did the artist put the scale in the middle of the painting at the very beginning? (maybe first the background wall, but then the scale) thought that would be an interesting grounding piece for the artist to work around and place balancing and unbalancing elements around the balance.
+- I thought that the painting left me feeling maybe a little dissatisfied, like I wanted compositional completeness but something feels missing? I felt I guess... off? only slightly so.
+- The balance itself is kind of hard to see, or maybe easy to miss? wonder if that speaks to the balance in the painting being easy to miss?
+
+Then AI gave some context on those thoughts. The highlight for me being about Judgement Day.
+
+I realized in a moment of reflection the religious trauma I feel I still have.
+{{</aside>}}

content/posts/26-03-20-have-we-lost-the-stars.md

@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
+---
+date: 2026-03-20T02:09:41-06:00
+description: "Humans spent thousands of years staring up at the sky. Now I wonder if many of us do at all."
+image: "/images/moonlit_landscape_with_bridge_1990.6.1.webp"
+image_caption: "Moonlit Landscape with Bridge: Aert van der Neer"
+image_alt: "In almost complete darkness, we look across reeds and grasses lining a river spanned by narrow, arched, stone bridge ahead of us in this moonlit, horizontal landscape painting. The horizon comes about a third of the way up the painting, just over the footbridge, and the sky is filled with clouds that glow blush pink, flint gray, and lavender purple. The small, porcelain-white moon casts an opalescent gleam on the water under the arch of the bridge. Barely visible in the gloom, a walking path lined by a fence in the lower right corner leads to a copse of tall trees to our right. Closer inspection reveals a man wearing crimson red and a woman wearing pine green standing together near the gate of a walled enclosure beyond the trees. Moonlight glints on their white collars and cuffs, and on the gold buttons and embroidery on their clothing. Spires and buildings with stepped rooflines along the riverbank are outlined against the illuminated sky, though most of the details of the structures are swallowed in shadow. "
+lastmod: 2026-03-20T03:02:02-06:00
+showTableOfContents: false
+tags: ["technology", "philosophy"]
+title: "Have We Lost the Stars?"
+type: "post"
+draft: false
+---
+
+There is a park near my home.
+
+In the middle of this park is a modest hill. If one lays down on the top of the hill, looking to the heavens, your visual field is left stranded in the deep blue.
+
+I have started going out at night with my dog. He gets to run, and I gaze.
+
+In our ever-quickening modern world, I wonder how often we look up at the sky. Aside from this recent curiosity, I really only take the opportunity when camping or deep in nature.
+
+Its a shame really. Its most always there just waiting to be admired.
+
+The sky is full and (mostly) untouched from human expansion. It remains clear and free from cement sidewalk and suburban sprawl. Until we fill the night sky with satellites, it even twinkles with distant planets and galaxies.
+
+## Humans Gazed Through History
+
+I have a hunch, an intuition completely unfounded in any hard science. I think for millennia humans concluded their days staring into crackling fires or expansive night skies.
+
+Now, many of us end our days staring into a neat little grid of LED's, myself included.
+
+What, if anything, have we lost?
+
+I wonder if we wonder less.
+
+I feel instinctual attraction to an open flame. And when camping, I can't resist gazing up in awe.
+
+I would wager these infinities are not being tapped into as often.
+
+Not to sound like a [Luddite (Wikipedia)](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luddite), but with every new piece of technology, I can't help but think there are always trade-offs. The less obvious the exchange, the more insidious.
+
+We humans can't stand the tedium. We want everything to be seamless. Processed. Pre-digested ideally. Just give me the AI summary. A tiktok or YouTube short will suffice. We get our information from hyper-processed, cream-of-the-algorithmic-crop content.
+
+Insights are not discovered, they are simply repeated.
+
+Contemplation is now just an appearance.
+
+Why meditate when we have [Marcus Aurelius' (Wikipedia)](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meditations) cheat sheet?
+
+I'm not arguing against access to information.
+
+I do think one of the treasures we traded for infinite knowledge was our considering gaze.